Search for: "State v. Long." Results 8281 - 8300 of 51,511
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2015, 7:02 pm by Sandy Levinson
  Indeed, it is not unthinkable that Antonin Scalia believes that "sovereign states" within the US have such a right, as the US Supreme Court suggested in the 1837 case Mayor of New York v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am by Tom Pritchard
Contractual interpretation has long been in tension between the magnetism of literal interpretation and business efficacy; the decision that is handed down following yesterday’s hearing should add a new chapter to that debate. [read post]
14 Feb 2015, 5:03 am by SHG
United States, and its significance in deciding this case questioning how long a traffic stop can be extended to wait for the drug dog to show and do as he’s told: The apparent confusion in the courtroom was useful in one respect: It illuminated the cluelessness of Chief Justice John Roberts when it comes to traffic stops. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 4:59 pm
I wish I could say that the Ninth Circuit and California Court of Appeal returned from their long (at least formal) vacation breaks with a vengeance, and cranked out a couple of dozen published opinions that are of the must-read variety.But that'd be a lie.Now, if you're a class action attorney (on either side), it's a somewhat interesting day for you. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:15 am
 Maybe I should be satisfied with a judicial system that says that even though we're a democracy, we can do terrible things and as long as we at some point stop, everything's good. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:29 pm
 One of the classic stories he would often recount related to how law often remained unchanged in Virginia, the state in which he lived and practiced law. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:23 am
The District Court for the Middle District of Florida recently considered a grisly Florida defective products case, explaining that state law prevents a person injured by certain unsafe products from suing if the product was used after it's "useful life. [read post]