Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 8281 - 8300 of 19,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
In 2023, the Supreme Court delivered a major victory for free speech in 303 Creative v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
It should be remebered that only Justice Thomas resorted to originalism in SFFA v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:58 am
He held that the court could not intervene under section 44 of the AA, because there was no actual or intended arbitration, but that the court still had jurisdiction under section 37 of the SCA. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As I shall explain, that aspect of Braidwood finds support in the Supreme Court’s 2014 decision in Burwell v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:53 am by SHG
Jamelle Bouie raises a very interesting point from Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent in Biden v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 8:40 am by Ken Krupat
  In doing so, the court relied on the decision of Bohemier v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 7:20 am by Joshua Matz
’” Commentators also focused on the Court’s upcoming argument in Jackson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 8:23 am
AS PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED IN THE RURAL VOICE:In the oft-cited case of Toronto Area Transit Operating Authority v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:07 pm
The Supreme Court, in an opinion written by Chief Justice Parker, rejected both arguments. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 10:05 am by Charlotte Garden
Most courts have held that the arbitration agreement is still enforceable unless the other party has been prejudiced. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
  Given that Batson is still good law, however, all the Justices are in the position of having to assess whether the litigant's "arbitrary and capricious" reason is race-based. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:18 am by Michael Klarman
A third member of the Windsor majority, Justice Ginsburg, has repeatedly stated that the Court erred in Roe v. [read post]