Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2019, 9:47 am
Add captionState v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
With a new judge presiding, the military commission in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:14 am
There is no cross-examination of witnesses in the Court of Appeal and fresh evidence is hardly ever permitted. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:18 pm
In today’s case (Redmond v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 7:44 am
” “Such a request by the SEC ‘does not exceed its statutory authority or cross any constitutional lines,’ the judge wrote. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:39 am
After United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:57 am
In Bowen v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 9:09 am
Because a dog cannot be cross-examined like a police officer on the scene whose observations often provide the basis for probable cause to search a vehicle, the State must introduce evidence concerning the dog's reliability. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:36 am
The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was denied and the defendant’s motion was granted in part and denied in part (Cellular Accessories For Less, Inc v Trinitas LLC, September 16, 2014, Pregerson, D). [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 11:36 am
The Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill was introduced by the Government on June 13, 2019, following the Owens v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:19 am
I graduated from Albany Law School in 1995 and was admitted to the New York State Bar in 1996. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:03 am
The following is my opening statement followed by the panel outline with some page number cross references to the panel materials. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 7:04 am
Key Points and Implications For Transfer Compliance As already stated, the DPC decision largely repeats key elements of the Schrems II ruling about U.S. law not providing “essentially equivalent” protection to EU law and the limitations of SCCs (including the updated 2021 version). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 7:11 am
In Mohamed v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
” Under Part V, “Protection from suffering detriment in employment,” of this law, 47B on “Protected disclosures” states that, “A worker has the right not to be subjected to any detriment by any act, or any deliberate failure to act, by his employer done on the ground that the worker has made a protected disclosure. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:25 am
A few days later she offered to resign but the CEO refused to accept, stating she was an asset to the organization. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:12 am
It also found that the no-solicitation and no-recruiting covenants she signed did not serve a legitimate business interest under state law and were unenforceable. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:23 am
Under United States v. [read post]
