Search for: "Mark Cover"
Results 8301 - 8320
of 18,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2013, 11:18 pm
Shamnad covered this decision (here). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:37 am
The Court holds that the arbitrary nature of this mark’s features, such as text placement and the use of script lettering make this mark a strong mark even apart from the strength of the secondary meaning associated with JIMI HENDRIX as well. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:37 am
The Court holds that the arbitrary nature of this mark’s features, such as text placement and the use of script lettering make this mark a strong mark even apart from the strength of the secondary meaning associated with JIMI HENDRIX as well. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm
Lines are not marked properly. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
(Patent Docs) US: Court report – Numerous false marking suits filed by Simonian against various respondents concerning products including: Claritin-D, Hypo Tears, Interceptor, Prevacid, Advil, Heartguard Heartworm Canine Medication (Patent Docs) US: False marking suit brought over marking of Accu-Chek products: O’Neill v Roche Diagnostics Corp (Patent Docs) US: President’s health care plan includes pay-for-delay ban and biosimilar regulatory pathway… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:56 am
Registering your own trade mark and not getting any legal advice at all is an even worse decision because few people manage to properly cover the full scope of their business when they do their own registration. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:56 pm
" Mike also covers another factually similar decision (web designer / client dispute) from the Ninth Circuit that arrived at the opposite result. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 10:49 am
Ironically, Anderson’s applications were for the mark FUTURE. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:18 am
For that claim to succeed, Sony needed to show that: (1) the PlayStation mark was famous; (2) Connectix was making a commercial use of the mark; (3) Connectix’s use began after the mark became famous; and (4) Connectix’s use of the mark diluted the quality of the mark by diminishing the capacity of the mark to identify and distinguish goods and services. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:58 am
This is an appeal by OHIM against the decision of the Court of First Instance to allow registration as a Community trade mark of the word CELLTECH. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 10:45 am
Rihanna’s trademarks cover a number of products, including makeup, fragrances, and sneakers. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:05 am
(Patent Docs) US: Court report – Numerous false marking suits filed by Simonian against various respondents concerning products including: Claritin-D, Hypo Tears, Interceptor, Prevacid, Advil, Heartguard Heartworm Canine Medication (Patent Docs) US: False marking suit brought over marking of Accu-Chek products: O’Neill v Roche Diagnostics Corp (Patent Docs) US: President’s health care plan includes pay-for-delay ban and biosimilar regulatory pathway… [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 9:00 am
Sept. 17, 2019): “Cyber Liability and Data Breach Response Coverage” insurance policy does not cover competitive keyword advertising lawsuit. * Volkswagen AG v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
(...)The court found that TransCore’s rights in the previ- ously asserted patents, as against MARK IV technology, were exhausted by its covenant not to sue MARK IV. [read post]
10 May 2009, 11:29 pm
[The new rule might be relaxed a bit to allow an applicant to submit a catalog as a specimen of use for goods, provided that at least one specimen shows the mark on one of the products in the catalog and the mark in question appears on the catalog cover.]Under this proposed new specimen-of-use rule, false verifications would be less frequent. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am
Amy Howe covers the order list for this blog; her coverage was originally published at Howe on the Court. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:09 pm
Lines are not marked properly. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:00 am
"In this case, therefore, the 'essential facts' alleged by Nylok in the infringement action - related to Nylok's ownership of the mark and Nasalok's allegedly infringing behaviour - do not form the basis of the cancellation claim now asserted by Nasalok, which is based on attributes of Nylok's mark and on Nylok's actions in obtaining registration of that mark. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 2:51 pm
The Court holds that the arbitrary nature of this mark’s features, such as text placement and the use of script lettering make this mark a strong mark even apart from the strength of the secondary meaning associated with JIMI HENDRIX as well. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 5:48 pm
The false patent marking issue was somewhat more serious. [read post]
