Search for: "United States v. Justice" Results 8301 - 8320 of 32,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that Chief Justice John Roberts has recused himself from Life Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 7:25 am by Amy Howe
The justices declined to take up the property-rights question presented by a California case, 616 Croft Avenue v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 8:09 am by Gene Quinn
By: Gene Quinn (IPWatchdog.com) Last week, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the matter of Bowman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 3:05 pm by NARF
Tying a tribal officer's hands: Tribal law enforcement authority under United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
” [Institute for Justice “Short Circuit” on Camm v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am by John Jascob
Dissenting Justices Kagan, Breyer, and Sotomayor argued that the Court issued an advisory opinion that flies “in the face of the statute Congress wrote,” while President Joe Biden called it a “devastating decision that aims to take our country backwards” (West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
 http://katzjustice.com    Preparation for United States Supreme Court oral arguments requires exhaustive preparedness. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:58 am by Ronald Mann
The Fifth Circuit did no better in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 6:41 pm by Todd Janzen
In 1946, a North Carolina chicken farmer sued the United States government for trespass by air. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 3:43 pm by Charles Kuck
I represent the appellees Rigo Rivera, Josafat Santillan, and the other young women and men behind me, all of whom hold valid DACA approvals.On June 15, 1982 the Supreme Court of the United States issued its landmark decision in Plyer v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:07 pm by Todd Janzen
EPA, the recent wetlands case before the United State Supreme Court, provided its observers with a lot of insight into what issues are important to the justices. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:00 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
But Chief Justice Kem Thompson Frost offered up a concurrence suggesting the law and science are out of whack:In  the  forty-three  years since  the Supreme Court of the United States articulated the Biggers factors, scientists have been studying whether these factors accurately predict the reliability of a witness’s identification. [read post]