Search for: "D. A."
Results 8321 - 8340
of 291,399
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2023, 4:37 am
You’d need to change software. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:16 am
You’ve done nothing wrong, and you’d like to continue as a shareholder rather than have your investment liquidated. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:05 am
Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesis Christ of Latter-Day Saints, (D UT, filed 10/31/2023) alleges in part:1. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
If you have insights on a securities law, capital markets or corporate governance trend or development that you’d like to share, please reach out to me or John! [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:00 am
COMPANY IS ALLEGED TO HAVE MADE FALSE STATEMENTS TO THE EPAAccording to a press release issued by the United States Department of Justice, SMC Systems, d/b/a Skyetec, has agreed to pay $2.35 million to resolve allegations that it violated federal law -- the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA). [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) unveiled a legislative framework for AI, which mainly focuses on the privacy, national security, and copyright implications of the technology. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 7:25 pm
Maria Elena Durazo (D), increases the minimum wage for health care workers to $25 an hour over the coming years. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 4:18 pm
La ley se promulgó el 8 de junio, el procurador dictaminó el 18 de junio de 1987, y la Corte fecha su sentencia cuatro días después de eso, el 22 de junio. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 4:12 pm
I don’t know if I’d go that far, but I do believe Altman should recuse in future cases where his NR essay might cause his impartiality to be reasonably questioned—for example, as posited by one commenter, a case involving a local professor fired for antisemitic or pro-Hamas remarks (even if recusal might not be strictly required, as Judge Singhal argued in his SDFLA Blog post). [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 4:00 pm
La Titulaire justifiait le dépôt de sa nouvelle requête subsidiaire par le fait que l'opinion de la Chambre suggérait une nouvelle interprétation possible pour l'organe de commande de la revendication 1, en indiquant que les deux leviers 43 et 44 du document O2 pourraient correspondre à un tel organe.Toutefois, l'opinion indiquait en outre, suivant en cela les arguments de l'Opposante, que la [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 3:10 pm
Health plans, health care providers, healthcare clearinghouses and their business associates (“Covered Entities” should check out this new Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) video intended to educate health care industry players about real world cyber-attack trends from OCR breach reports, OCR investigations and how implementation of appropriate Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) Security Rile compliance can mitigate their exposure to… [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 11:16 am
Supp. 3d 1201, 1204 (D. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 9:46 am
According to court documents, on March 25, Aimenn D. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 8:05 am
And so we structured all of our practice around that first, and I’d love to talk to you about that today. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 6:43 am
Eliminating Criminal Law Evan D. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 6:32 am
With the first American pro football game of the day kicking off in Frankfurt this morning, you'd think somebody in our charity game would step up and order a hot 'dog. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 4:02 am
So losing the bosom...Earlier, Gonzalez had used the word "bosom" to refer to what had happened to her "my once-fabulous tits" — they'd "transmogrified into a bosom. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Les intimés font face à diverses accusations, notamment de fraude, d’abus de confiance, de corruption dans les affaires municipales et de complot, à l’issue d’une enquête menée par l’Unité permanente anticorruption. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 3:06 am
I'd like to see a corresponding NYT article outlining them too. [read post]
5 Nov 2023, 12:56 am
In a similar vein, while the initial proposals from the European Commission provide that no more than one examiner (in a three-member panel) should come from a national patent office that has made use of the exemption to not examine the conditions of Article 3(c) and 3(d), the JURI Committee intends to tighten this requirement to completely exclude any examiners from national patent offices that do not examine the Article 3(c) and 3(d) conditions. [read post]
