Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 11,204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2008, 4:51 am
Michael V. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
The certified question arose in Keystone Airpark Authority v. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 4:46 pm
The landmark case Shloss v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of the main request before the Board read (in English translation):A method for controlling phytopathogenic harmful fungi, characterised in that the fungi or the materials, plants, the soil or seeds to be protected against fungal attack are treated with an effective amount of a compound of formula I wherein X is C1-C12 alkylene or C2-C12 alkenylene, where the carbon chains may be interrupted by one or two heteroatoms selected from the group consisting of S, O and NR1 , R1 is… [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:31 am
The American rule contrasts with the English Rule, under which the losing party pays the prevailing party’s attorneys’ fees. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:13 am
Geltl v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 10:45 am
So it was perfectly acceptable--i.e., unlike the case with Bush v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 4:10 am
Sources: Frank Koricic v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:46 am
Secondly, the drafters have transplanted English and American principles into the guidelines, where they do not always fit, either with each other or with the Chinese political reality (the American public figure doctrine from New York Times v Sullivan for example, carries none of its original weight in a system where party officials are simply not counted as public figures). [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Ct. of Int'l Trade) in CVB, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
There's no other explanation.I was reminded of this the other day when I underwent the dreary ordeal of re-reading Justice Ginsburg's recent opinion in Cunningham v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
In EMI v Eircom Kelly J said, of the rights of privacy:"the statutory entitlements, whether they arise under the Data Protection legislation of the Postal and telecommunications legislation are subject to a provision which permits the confidentiality to be legitimately breached by an order of the Court. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
The article takes on about a century's worth of legal prejudices, nowadays associated with the Supreme Court's decision in Erie Railroad Co. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 1:10 am
Further reading: the IPKat recommends Austrian blogger and lawyer Maximilian Schubert's (aka Austrotrabant) detailed review of this case, please click here (in English!). [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:00 am
Prosecutors, like judges, must be free to do their jobs without fear of being sued later, the high court said in the case of Imbler v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 1:31 am
The first is the influence of the Brown v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 6:20 am
Plaintiff in Mobley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 3:47 pm
I ran into this dilemma the other day when discussing the classic case of Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 8:23 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 6:41 pm
In Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Co. v. [read post]
