Search for: "High v State" Results 8321 - 8340 of 35,521
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2019, 6:48 am by Larry
We should add some context before we move on.The Court of Customs and Patent Appeals faced a similar question in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm by Kalvis Golde
In fact, Article III of the Constitution specifically lists suits between states as an explicit reason for establishing a high court. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 10:07 am by John Jascob
The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has unsealed the docket and released numerous documents in the long-running CFTC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 10:55 pm
" Associated Newspapers have stated that they "categorically deny that the duchess's letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:15 pm by Eric Goldman
Arguably, we might view the period right before RTBF’s launch as the high-water mark of Internet freedom. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 8:17 am by Dan Bressler
” “New Insights On Privilege, Ethics Duties For In-House Attys” — “In Fischman v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
Stated otherwise, what is the relationship between trademark awareness and brand strength? [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
  The factors a Data Controller in Google’s position are required to consider were considered and discussed by the English High Court in NT1 & NT2 v Google LLC [2018] EWHC 799 (QB) (see our blog here). [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 4:26 pm by Mike Le
In addition, low-wage workers are reportedly more dependent upon the gig economy than high-wage workers. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:12 pm
  The court refers to its prior affirmance of the FCC’s common carrier reclassification decision, United States Telecommunications Ass’n. v. [read post]