Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 35,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm
Petitioner and Z.M.F.Z. were both dual citizens of the United States and Mexico. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 10:59 am
” [United States v.] [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
For the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the Taylor Law, the term "public employee" means any person holding a position by appointment or employment in the service of a public employer except:[1] judges and justices of the unified court system;[2] persons holding positions by appointment or employment in the organized militia of the state; and [3] persons who may reasonably be designated from time to time as managerial or confidential upon application… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
For the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the Taylor Law, the term "public employee" means any person holding a position by appointment or employment in the service of a public employer except:[1] judges and justices of the unified court system;[2] persons holding positions by appointment or employment in the organized militia of the state; and [3] persons who may reasonably be designated from time to time as managerial or confidential upon application… [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm
Scott Johnson and his lawyers are among the most prolific serial filers in the United States, but the Ninth Circuit has eliminated any meaningful standing requirement in ADA cases, so the only real defense is compliance with the law. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 9:41 am
, United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 9:17 am
Rachael Hanna recapped last week’s proceedings in the United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 5:54 am
As the Supreme Court’s opinion last term in Trump v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:49 am
United States, 267 U.S. 132, 162 45 S. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
United States, 559 U.S. 196 (2010). [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Judge Watkins questioned the defense’s assertion that Brady applies both to sentencing and in the military commissions, following United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:40 am
Judge William A. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
United States (2000), Rehnquist declined to expressly overrule Miranda v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court held in Rutherford Food Corporation v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Adams v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 11:05 am
The court argued that INS v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
Reddy’s”) infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 7,772,209 (“the ‘209 Patent”). [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:55 am
Roberts, 468 U.S. 27 (1984), fn. 6; United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
The flag-burning decision, Texas v. [read post]
