Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8321 - 8340 of 21,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In an underlying action, Equustek claimed that the defendants, including Datalink, began to re-label one of Equustek’s products and pass it off as Datalink’s own, while acting as a distributor of Equustek’s products. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 8:00 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
” The city asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit based on the state’s recreational-use statute, which prevents a landowner from being held liable for injuries occurring on land that is available for free public use. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
After this jury trial, the jury signed its verdict for $5,600,000 finding the defendants, and each of them, jointly liable. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 5:37 am by Yin Li
The Beijing IP Court found Sony liable for not reaching FRAND license and being an unwilling licensee, and then granted the first FRAND-encumbered injunction in favor of an SEP holder in China. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 5:37 am by Yin Li
The Beijing IP Court found Sony liable for not reaching FRAND license and being an unwilling licensee, and then granted the first FRAND-encumbered injunction in favor of an SEP holder in China. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:14 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The mode of operation approach holds that a defendant in a premises liability action will be liable if the mode of operation chosen by the owner is the reason for the injury that occurred to cause the plaintiff to suffer a personal injury. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:14 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The mode of operation approach holds that a defendant in a premises liability action will be liable if the mode of operation chosen by the owner is the reason for the injury that occurred to cause the plaintiff to suffer a personal injury. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 7:46 am by John Jascob
In Leidos, the court held specifically that the plain language of Item 303 requires actual knowledge of the relevant trend or uncertainty in order to be liable for failing to disclose it. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:58 am by Robin Shea
Can an outside attorney defending an employer in a lawsuit under the Fair Labor Standards Act be liable for retaliation against the plaintiff-employee based on litigation tactics? [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
While the Defendant can earn as much as $300.00 per hour based on a worker’s labor, Plaintiff and others earn below the minimum wage. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“I have here a stack of affidavits declaring the defendant a good boy. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:12 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
In opposition to the plaintiff’s negligence and premises liability claims, the defendants argued that they were entitled to summary judgment because the skylight was readily apparent. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:18 am by James Kachmar
Jordan-Benel later sued and alleged copyright infringement and that certain defendants were liable for breach of an implied in fact contract based on his submission of his Settlers Day script. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:18 am by James Kachmar
Jordan-Benel later sued and alleged copyright infringement and that certain defendants were liable for breach of an implied in fact contract based on his submission of his Settlers Day script. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:30 am by Joseph Tartakovsky
It is the states, after all, who defend capital trials for decades afterwards and who must retry or release defendants with overturned convictions. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:11 pm by Lorraine Fleck
Ultimately, while Google may not be liable for the harm to Equustek, Google is the conduit for how that harm has continued given Datalink’s defiance of multiple court orders from an unknown location. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:29 am by John C. Manoog III
According to the plaintiff, the defendants alleged malpractice occurred when it did not “properly treat his complaints of pain. [read post]