Search for: "State v. F. T."
Results 8321 - 8340
of 18,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
State v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
§ 1396a(gg)] As one proponent of the law explained, [I]f you’re a state and you don’t set up an exchange, that means your citizens don’t get their tax credits—but your citizens still pay the taxes that support this bill. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
F–k Cancer charity founders to face off in B.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 9:24 am
Corp, 244 F. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:50 am
In Murphy v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:27 am
He allegedly referred to her as “f’ing Jamaican” and stated that Jamaicans live in huts and eat cats and dogs, among other things. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:05 am
Burwell, “[t]here was not a single instance of an administration official warning that if states decided not to run their own health care exchanges, their citizens would not be eligible for the tax credit subsidies. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 11:06 am
Lindstrom and industry lawyer F. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:42 am
Par Sterile Products, LLC v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:56 pm
Lindstrom, representing the twenty-one states challenging the EPA, with thirty minutes; F. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published today in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék -- that's the Budapest Municipal Court, if you didn't know ["I knew that", said Merpel ...]. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
See In re Accutane Products Liability, 511 F. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:32 am
They surely can’t handle the responsibilities for treating every driver as an employee, could they? [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:28 am
See, e.g., Park ’N Fly, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
http://t.co/5FwuTQfV7i -> US states vow to fight Google after the FTC meekly rolls over http://t.co/05SSbWyR2F -> [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 8:09 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al. (1999). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:06 pm
United States, 381 F.2d 403 (1967) Baltazar Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm
Because the superior-court petition was untimely, it wasn't "properly filed" under Pace v. [read post]
