Search for: "State v. Plan"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 29,608
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2019, 4:57 am
The undue burden precedent comes from the 1992 Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 12:00 am
Vale v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Employers may, for example, treat one group more favorably than another pursuant to a bona fide affirmative action plan in order to remedy past discrimination (Johnson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:07 pm
And now per a new California Supreme Court case (Ward v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 12:06 pm
The case is Moore v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 11:49 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 8:14 am
While the Commission has given no guidance as to what this documentation must include or when it must be added to the public file, we believe that a quarterly certification which states that the station continues to broadcast at least 18 hours per day, that it broadcasts on average at least three hours per week of locally produced programming, and lists the titles of such locally produced programs should be sufficient. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 7:13 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear argument in American Legion v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 11:28 am
On April 15, the Apple & contract manufacturers v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 10:23 am
Section 230 * Weimer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 12:49 pm
On February 20, 2019, the United States Supreme Court decided Timbs v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 7:15 am
At Georgia State University, I first heard the word to name who I am: transgender. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 7:03 am
Putnam Investments, LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 12:11 pm
Falk Pharma GMBH v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 11:52 am
A California Court of Appeal recently issued an order in Ward v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
My own view is that both the Lemon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Because Democrats have passed laws in some states to protect the status quo, should the Supreme Court—freshly packed by Republicans with extreme ideologues—turn the question of abortion rights back to the states by overturning Roe v. [read post]
