Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 8321 - 8340
of 15,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2013, 9:22 am
A 2007 study found “[v]ery little evidence of an ‘anticommons problem. [read post]
The Canadian Copyright Board: To Be or Not To Be –That Is A Question – ALAI Conference, May 25, 2016
28 Jun 2016, 2:37 pm
A new study commissioned by the Government from Prof. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:11 am
The Supreme Court in Brnovich v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:25 pm
The court's total deference to the stated reasons for a taking establishes a standard so minimal, it is doubtful that even the majority in Kelo v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
The suit, Doe v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
But see DeLuca v. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Palin v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
” Copyright Promotes Knowledge The copyright statutes passed in the States prior to the drafting of the Constitution use similar language. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 pm
The California Supreme Court in the 2008 case, Edwards v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm
This infrequently addressed issue in the court system was recently taken on by the Appellate Division in Schambach v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am
United States Influencer Logan Paul has filed a defamation lawsuit against Stephen Findeisen, better known as “Coffeezilla” on YouTube, over videos he produced about Paul’s failed CryptoZoo non-fungible token (NFT) project in 2022. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 7:43 am
Our next case is a sequel: Moore v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
“The State cannot use criminal defamation cases to throttle democracy,” he observed. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
People of the State of California v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 9:03 am
Italy’s Minister of Culture Gennaro Sangiuliano echoed this sentiment, expressing appreciation for the ruling and stating that “[i]t must be said that the use for commercial purposes for cultural goods must be paid while it must be free for images for educational and study purposes. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Alabama by repeatedly rescheduling the case before it ever reached conference, presumably to give her the time to study the case and write the opinion. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:42 pm
Even before the announcement of Justice Kennedy’s retirement and the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, there’s been a marked increase in anti-choice legislation and threats to Roe v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:13 am
Miller, 405 F. 3d 700 (8th Cir. 2005); State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 6:27 pm
Mass., et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
In Arizona v. [read post]
