Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 48,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2020, 10:48 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:36 am
Skinner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:07 am
In many cases, business interruption insurance will cover relocation costs, including additional rent for a temporary location. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:57 am
GM’s high labor costs were not an injury proximately caused by FCA’s bribes (General Motors LLC v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
Sullivan Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 4:51 am
Kinship ties were an important mechanism for controlling agency costs. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Galle, The Quick (Spending) and the Dead: The Agency Costs of Forever Philanthropy, (June 11, 2020). [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:30 am
This appeal will consider whether the Parole Board should be considered a court and if so, the consequences of this when considering whether or not to grant a costs order against the Parole Board. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 10:14 pm
Last week in Marbrow v Sharpes Garden Services Ltd [2020] EWHC B26 (Costs) (10 July 2020) the Senior Costs Judge Master Gordon-Saker handed down a reserved judgment in relation to three discreet issues where I acted for the Defendant paying party. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
In Chapter 11 of the “Canadian Health Law Practice Manual,” Genetics and the Law, Amy Zarzeczny, Tracey M. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:00 am
Occidental Chemical Corporation v. 21st Century Fox America, et. al., Civ. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:02 am
We would dismiss the appeal with costs. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 7:18 pm
In a postscript to last month’s decision in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited v Commissioner of Patents [2020] FCA 778 (see Federal Court Finds Computer-Implemented Gaming Machine Patent-Eligible in Australia), the court has now ruled that the Commissioner of Patents should pay only 50% of Aristocrat’s costs associated with its expert evidence. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
On July 9, the Supreme Court decided Trump v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:30 pm
It’s honest, it concedes costs, it identifies the trade-off, and it tries to cabin the scope. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:26 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 10:03 am
An increasing number of cases, including most recently ZN (Afghanistan) v SSHD [2018] 3 Costs LO 357, recognise this reality. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Supp. 1299 (E.D.N.C. 1968); the cost of freight and transportation of materials.S. for Use & Benefit of Mid Seven Transp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
Supp. 1299 (E.D.N.C. 1968); the cost of freight and transportation of materials.S. for Use & Benefit of Mid Seven Transp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:29 am
” See Little Sisters v. [read post]
