Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 16,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2014, 9:30 pm
Yet, over a century later, Justice Scalia in Arizona v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:15 pm
The petition of the day is: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
In Hillstone Restaurant Group v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:55 am
From State v. [read post]
Argument preview: What can a federal habeas petitioner argue when defending a judgment in his favor?
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am
However, an amicus brief filed by the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Jennings v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:57 am
” State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 9:48 am
See, for example, R v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:48 am
Further, the court stated, different purposes underlie the state unemployment compensat [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:28 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 5:25 pm
The river then crosses and into Nebraska before crossing back into Kansas, where it then turns southeasterly. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 7:08 am
But this blog entry will summarize only the holding of Devito v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm
Does he need to cross-appeal? [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:40 pm
The crossing is the town’s only access point into Turkey and its loss would prevent any civilian refugees from fleeing. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 10:47 am
” The court brought up US v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are: Haygood v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 4:00 am
Anonymous cross-moved to compel WCSD to comply with the subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am
Farina 13-1227Issue: Whether a habeas court may evade the highly deferential standard of review in the habeas statute by characterizing its legal and policy differences with the state court as unreasonable factual determinations and grant the writ on the basis of ineffectiveness of appellate counsel when the state court held that the cross-examination of the mitigation witness was not fundamental error under state law. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:40 am
One of the most significant examples was an Ohio Supreme Court case, State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:51 pm
Last Friday plaintiffs (appellees/cross-appellants) in Klayman v. [read post]
