Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2010, 4:46 am
McKinney v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:57 am
By Daniel RichardsonHall v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm
Trunzo v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 1:47 pm
By Nicole KilloranState v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:57 am
By Daniel RichardsonHall v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 12:13 pm
Denson v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 2:56 am
Nevertheless, the Claimant had made substantial changes to the Remcon design, including to the vents, label indentation, position of the lock and the removal of the handle.As HHJ Hacon noted the Defendants allegation that the design of the whole locker lacked originality "did not get off to a flying start" as they had admitted that five features of the locker were original [24]. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 8:30 am
Written in the aftermath of Bush v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
The Court added that, while the licence clauses should be taken into account, the determination was ultimately a question for the court, taking into account policy considerations as in Yates Circuit Foil Co v Electrofoils Ltd [1976] FSR 345. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 2:17 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judges [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 6:48 am
The case was brought by Barilla against a manufacturer of cushions shaped like Barilla cookies and labelled with words identical or similar to the names of Barilla products. [read post]
15 May 2020, 5:57 am
Hosp. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 4:00 am
In New York v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm
Lee v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:07 am
Presumably everybody reading this already knows that yesterday the Supreme Court was simply busy - and decided the Bruesewitz v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Yesterday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 8:47 am
At the oral argument in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm
Once a particular transaction is labeled a ‘service,’ as opposed to a ‘sale’ of a ‘product,’ it is outside the purview of our product liability statute”); Zelle v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:34 pm
” Lee v. [read post]
