Search for: "North v. State" Results 8341 - 8360 of 13,330
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 6:31 am by John Elwood
North Carolina, 13-504; Maxwell v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 2:49 am by Jon Gelman
The decision of Bellino v Verizon, 2014 WL 10301786 (NJ App Div 2014) is a factual situation that seem to draw the ire of many insurance companies and employers. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am by Guest Blogger
After the Constitution had been ratified, as a representative from Virginia to the First Federal Congress, he behaved as many loose constructionists do, approving matters he liked even if these are not covered within specific provisions of the Constitution: *On April 20, 1789, two men asked Congress to support a private scientific expedition to Baffin’s Bay that would investigate the magnetic north pole. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:00 am by pvwlaw
North Dakota[1], states have to be careful about how they collect sales tax from remote sellers, otherwise they might violate the Constitution. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:45 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
In 2012, the state Court of Appeals entertained Constitutional challenges brought by Vermitsky in another case, Filipowski v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:22 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 26 March 2014. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:05 am by Walter Olson
Many of his positions on church-state matters would normally be taken for quite liberal; for example, he argued the recent Supreme Court case of Town of Greece v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
The first guerrilla organizers were dissident army officers, appalled by their country’s subservience to U.S. interests, and then university intellectuals, shut out of electoral politics by state repression of the left. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]