Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 8341 - 8360
of 178,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
’” Yet the very nature of the Abitron dispute—between a US plaintiff (Hetronic) and its former Austrian and German distributors (together referred to here as Abitron)—vividly illustrates that territories are highly permeable and possibly even anachronistic in an age of globalized commerce and trade, especially in IP cases where intangibles know no borders. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
The plaintiffs in Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Plaintiffs then appealed Supreme Court's order and its judgment [1] dismissing the proceeding and [2] denying, "as academic," the Plaintiffs' motion for other judicial relief. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Plaintiffs then appealed Supreme Court's order and its judgment [1] dismissing the proceeding and [2] denying, "as academic," the Plaintiffs' motion for other judicial relief. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:17 am
In March 2018, the plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for legal malpractice arising out of the defendants’ prior legal representation of it in connection with a purchase agreement of the plaintiff’s restaurant business. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 5:16 am
New England's top injury law firm has represented New Hampshire plaintiffs and their families for over 40 years. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:36 am
Lazer Spot, Inc. then filed to dismiss Whitlock’s motion, arguing that his challenges did not state a claim. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 3:30 am
Some of the plaintiff’s coworkers did not like the post. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:46 am
Many lawsuits arise from a plaintiff’s complaint that the defendant lied about them. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:00 am
The medical expert strengthened the plaintiff’s case by establishing a clear link between the facility’s negligence and the harm suffered. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
There's no taking Westchester for a ride! [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Writing for a majority of five, Justice Alito held that a plaintiff must show that the infringing “use in commerce” occurred domestically, emphasizing that the “ultimate question” on an extraterritoriality analysis is “the location of the conduct relevant to the focus” of the statute. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
A derivative claim is considered property of the entity, so a derivative petitioner / plaintiff must allege either pre-suit demand upon the entity’s board of directors or controllers or that such a demand would be futile. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:03 am
The complaint is based on the allegation that the defendants’ “failure to disclose Baxter’s true problems relating to its supply chain deceived investors (including Plaintiff) about the Company’s true financial health. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 8:58 am
Plaintiff appeals. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 7:05 am
It’s true that Section 230 only matters if the plaintiffs have meritorious substantive claims. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 9:00 am
However, as long as the plaintiff’s percentage of fault is less than 50%, they can still recover damages. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
The plaintiff claimed that a vote was required, under DGCL Section 271, because the sale constituted a sale of “all or substantially all” of the Company’s assets. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
The plaintiff claimed that a vote was required, under DGCL Section 271, because the sale constituted a sale of “all or substantially all” of the Company’s assets. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
In doing so, we rectify a fundamental error in the way federal courts define the immunity conferred by the FTCA’s Westfall Act. [read post]
