Search for: "In re A. V." Results 8361 - 8380 of 62,944
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2021, 4:20 pm by Sandy Levinson
  As I argued in Framed:  America's 51 Constitutions and the Crisis of Governance, I am increasingly less interested in the kinds of debates about constitutional "meaning" that obsess the legal academy and more interested--or even obsessed--by the (un)wisdom of a variety of aspects of the Constitution that present no real challenges of "interpretation," including, for starters, the allocation of equal voting power in the Senate or the sheer difficulty of amending… [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 2:12 pm
  That's time and effort (and money) that can't be spent on what you're ordinarily doing, and it creates standing.So the principle that Judge McKeown espouses seems just wrong as a categorical matter. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:17 am
See the only Board decision upholding a fraud claim since In re Bose, namely, Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 11:39 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, the decision surprised many, including myself, as the court’s previous fair use decision, the 2013 decision in the Cariou v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:56 pm by Florian Mueller
In that case, the term "headwinds" might have been limited to the fact that the outcome before the Ninth Circuit was obviously disappointing for the FTC and Qualcomm (through its allies) had succeeded in portraying FTC v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
For those with a previous edition wondering what else the new edition might offer, significant updates include:Chapter 2 has been re-written to present a compact and comprehensive overview of international, EU and UK copyright law, including the impact of Brexit Chapter 3 includes recent EU case law on subsistence of copyright and its implications for the UK: Levola Hengelo, Cofemel, Brompton, Funke MedienChapter 4 considers the implications of the Court of Appeal’s decision in Martin… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm by admin
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]