Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8361 - 8380 of 21,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2017, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
The issue presented to the appellate court was whether an employer’s attorney can be held liable for retaliating against his client’s employee because the employee sued his client for violations of workplace laws? [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:14 am by Newman, Anzalone & Newman, LLP
The trial court sided with the defendants, concluding that the plaintiff was at fault for not maintaining a safe following distance. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:14 am by Cardone Law Firm
You are not required, however, to pursue your case by arguing that the defendant in your case is liable under Section 9:2800.6. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:30 am
If the court finds that the defendants are indeed liable for aiding and abetting CIA torture, we’ll be fighting on behalf of our clients for damages and other liability claims in a trial later this year. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:54 am by Kevin C. Ford, Trial Lawyer
But, even where state officials have been found individually liable for monetary damages, “the legislature should, and doubtless will, reimburse the defendant . . . [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 7:15 pm by Robichaud
Not only are impaired driving cases serious, they are also some of the most complicated type of crimes one can defend as a lawyer. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:11 pm
The Court found such inclusion was fair use and, as a consequence, the defendants were not liable for copyright infringement.Transformative use in an old-fashioned way! [read post]
Related Posts: Court Determines City May Be Liable in Dog Bite Case for Failing to Take Action, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, June 2, 2017 Court Dismisses Personal Injury Case, Applying “Firefighter’s Rule”, Indiana Injury Lawyer Blog, May 17, 2017 [read post]
For their role, the Town charged that the arranger defendants were liable as “arrangers” under §9607(a)(3) of CERCLA and sought contribution. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am by Robert M. Horwitz and Kyle M. Asher
Relatedly, some courts have found that a company who hires third parties to collect debts that they own are vicariously liable for that third party collection agent’s conduct. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am by Robert M. Horwitz and Kyle M. Asher
Relatedly, some courts have found that a company who hires third parties to collect debts that they own are vicariously liable for that third party collection agent’s conduct. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:17 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The Court’s Decision The court concluded that the defendants position – as an absolute statement of the law – was incorrect, and in some situations, an employer may be liable for punitive damages based on the conduct of its employee. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
This is particularly complicated when the plaintiff is already receiving care for preexisting injuries, as the law holds that defendants are not liable for damages caused by separate, independent, or intervening causes or injury. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:32 pm by Law Office of David S. Hagy, PLC
The jury returned its verdict: the defendant was found liable and the plainitff was owed damages in the amount of $350,000. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm by Law Office of David S. Hagy, PLC
The jury returned its verdict:  the defendant was found liable and the plainitff was owed damages in the amount of $350,000. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm by Law Office of David S. Hagy, PLC
The jury returned its verdict:  the defendant was found liable and the plainitff was owed damages in the amount of $350,000. [read post]