Search for: "State v. B. V."
Results 8361 - 8380
of 41,777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2020, 12:40 pm
N.J.A.C. 13:44-4.10 (b)(3). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:02 pm
Delta Sport's logoThe General Court of the EU ('the Court') recently (13 February 2020) issued its judgment in Case T-387/18 Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
§ 1400(b). [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
However, opined the court, “an award will not be overturned unless the award violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power” and that the grounds for vacating an arbitration award are narrowly construed.With respect to vacating an arbitration award on the grounds that it violates strong public policy, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Reddy v Schaffer, 123 AD3d 935, said that a court… [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
However, opined the court, “an award will not be overturned unless the award violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power” and that the grounds for vacating an arbitration award are narrowly construed.With respect to vacating an arbitration award on the grounds that it violates strong public policy, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Reddy v Schaffer, 123 AD3d 935, said that a court… [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
Yes on Prop B argued the law unconstitutionally burdens its right to free speech and cited an en banc Ninth Circuit panel decision in American Beverage Association v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 am
Moreover, § 1834(a)(17)(B) bars payments to a DME supplier that knowingly submits a claim that was generated as a result of a prohibited telephone solicitation. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:32 am
Kulch v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:02 am
This dates back to a case of Dodge v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 9:06 pm
V. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 8:37 pm
During this time and to the present, a conditional sentence was statutorily unavailable for these sexual offences, under ss. 742.1(b), 151 and 271). [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 2:01 pm
See Jametsky v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
Attorneys (AUSAs) filed a Government’s Sentencing Memorandum in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 12:00 pm
Connolly in Genentech, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:30 am
App. 2005); State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Most of the focus was probably on safe harbors b/c players were bigger on both sides: telcos v. big content providers. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:24 am
The Florida Second DCA ruled in Leonirez Heredia v. [read post]
