Search for: "True v True"
Results 8361 - 8380
of 33,962
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2019, 1:13 pm
The case is Sivubo Trading v Development Bank. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:32 am
Additional Resources: Normandin v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 9:10 am
” Lone Star Promotions v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 6:00 am
For the symposium on Sanford Levinson and Jack M. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:39 am
Absent mandatory language in the regs, or court decisions like Doe v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:14 am
In line with London County Council v Church Wardens and Overseers of the Poor of the Parish of Erith in the County of Kent [1893] AC 562, the Court held that “the true test is whether the occupation is of value”. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:17 am
Brave Law Firm, LLC v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:57 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
It is definitely true that norms of fairness matter a lot in authorship, including attribution in many circumstances—but not necessarily in the rigid categories formal law might use. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:01 am
The issue was whether PHM knew or had reason to believe that this was the case, specifically whether this was true of Mr Beatty, owner of LTEV, a shareholder in PHM and Managing Director of both companies.See no evil, here no evil, liable for no evilFBT referred the Court to Columbia Pictures Industries Inc v Robinson [1987] 1 Ch 38 where Scott J said that a person who deliberately refrains from inquiry and shuts their eyes to that which is obvious, cannot be heard to say that they… [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
14 May 2019, 6:56 am
In Nevada v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 5:00 am
” The court found that the statements were not forward-looking and were strictly true, so there was no duty to update when the U.S. renewal negotiations deteriorated (Pipefitters Union Local 537 Pension Fund v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:25 am
” “Here, accepting the counterclaim’s allegations as true and according Sakar the benefit of every favorable inference, Sakar states a claim for legal malpractice. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:30 am
However, the Supreme Court in Oncale v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am
The Supreme Court made clear on Monday that Roe v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 10:44 am
The same is true here for 2111 robbery. [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:53 am
Citing Hastie v State University of New York at Morrisville, the Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court's ruling, explained that the petition was properly dismissed.Turning to Plaintiffs' defamation claim involving "pseudonymous blog forum" entries allegedly posted by officials and Plaintiffs' former coworkers, the employer "produced a job description for police officers that does not require officers to engage with the public on the Internet, let alone… [read post]
13 May 2019, 8:53 am
Citing Hastie v State University of New York at Morrisville, the Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court's ruling, explained that the petition was properly dismissed.Turning to Plaintiffs' defamation claim involving "pseudonymous blog forum" entries allegedly posted by officials and Plaintiffs' former coworkers, the employer "produced a job description for police officers that does not require officers to engage with the public on the Internet, let alone… [read post]
13 May 2019, 7:10 am
Case citation: Ebeid v. [read post]
