Search for: "50 Doe Defendants"
Results 821 - 840
of 7,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
“Although the government does not dispute that conclusion, the government notes that it was only based on a 50-minute screening and submits that a full psychiatric or psychological screening…is warranted, given the serious nature of the criminal charges pending against the defendant and the likelihood that mental health issues may arise in the course of these proceedings. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
" The Court does not seem to have analyzed this case under the proper standard. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Defendants assert that the piece rate regulation endorses a hybrid compensation plan like BFI’s because it provides an example of an arrangement under which an employee is paid on both a piece rate and hourly basis.14 The example cited by Defendants appears in the regulation as follows: [I]f the employee has worked 50 hours and has [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 8:25 am
State hospital representatives did not return phone calls for comment.No resourcesThe state hospital does not treat sex offenders, said Belles' court-appointed attorney Neal Stelting,Neither does anyone else. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 5:42 am
It does not matter whether the defendant was acquitted or found guilty since either result will end the privilege against self-incrimination since a criminal case is no longer pending. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 11:43 am
" Both defenders and critics of originalism are encouraged to submit! [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:26 am
’ Mot. for JMOL Pre-Verdict 5-7 (“Rule 50(a) motion”); Defs’ Memo. in Support of JMOL Post-Verdict 8-9, 16-17 (“Rule 50(b) motion”); Defs. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 8:57 am
The standards council is funded by a $50 application fee per client, increased fines for those convicted of crime and court costs paid by civil litigants. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:40 am
The plaintiffs in the action are decedent and a niece and nephew of the decedent who allege that they own the remaining 50% interest in the realty. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 10:41 am
I have seen this before, as some judges will even reduce by 50% depending on the circumstances. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:15 am
It does not matter why. [read post]
23 May 2016, 2:27 pm
In our previous opinion, relyingon this standard, we held that the claims were not indefinite,holding that “the mere fact that the slope may bemeasured in more than one way does not make the claimsof the patent invalid. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 3:07 am
Tennessee’s discovery rule says that a plaintiff’s time limit to file suit does not start to run until the plaintiff knows or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should know that he or she has an injury as a result of wrongful conduct by a defendant. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:43 pm
“Accordingly, his purchasing history is largely irrelevant to typicality and does not warrant setting aside the court’s certification order. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
” While for some, this act may seem straightforward, it does have detractors as well. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
The fact that an injunction has not before been made against an internet search provider such as Google is reason to tread carefully, but does not establish that the Court does not have subject matter competence. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
The fact that an injunction has not before been made against an internet search provider such as Google is reason to tread carefully, but does not establish that the Court does not have subject matter competence. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 6:02 pm
Sosnowski at paras. 19-20 and 23-24… 50. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:00 am
What do you think of people who defended Jim Crow and “separate but equal” before Brown and the civil rights revolution; or people who believed, before the 1970s, that the Constitution does not guarantee women equality? [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 2:03 pm
One of these was defending the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. [read post]
