Search for: "AC v. State"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2015, 6:54 am
The UK House of Lords has also said in Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union (1995) 2 AC 513 (HL) that a situation where the executive never enforces a statute while continuing another legislation can never arise. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
Ace Foam, Inc., 14-577, also was rescheduled on February 18 for this Friday’s Conference. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:08 pm
Ac. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:27 am
But if one views this as unconstitutional, it's unconscionable to let states dodge the rule by playing silly semantic games.)It's easy to conclude that ACS v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:05 pm
Alan Morrison (GWU) offers his take on Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:24 am
Ace USA. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
* CIPA gives the Administrative Council something to chew onAs recently reported, situation at the European Patent Office (EPO) is getting hot in view of the Administrative Council (AC) meeting of 25 March. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 9:53 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Best, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Justice (Rev 1) [2015] EWCA Civ 17 The Court of Appeal considered the clash of s.144 LASPO and the rules on adverse possession, on appeal from the Administrative Court. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
Kagan v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 9:13 am
Ac. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:41 am
The 2004 decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers ([2004] 2 AC 457) was a significant case regarding privacy, and for human rights law and tort law more generally. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:27 pm
The first instance CJ stated he followed Sedleigh-Denfield v O’Callaghan [1940] AC 880 and Lord Wright: The liability for a nuisance is not, at least in modern law, a strict or absolute liability…he is not liable unless he continued or adopted the nuisance, or, more accurately, did not without undue delay remedy it when he became aware of it, or with ordinary and reasonable care should have become aware of it. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:36 pm
It is Seasons Style Number AC 15-0065. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:38 pm
Ace Patents Corp., 315 U.S. 126, 137 (1942); Keystone Driller Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 10:20 am
Hart Friends of the Kings River v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 26 [week ending Sunday 28 December] -- Arnold J on Ice cream van design in Whitby Specialist Vehicles v Yorkshire Specialist Vehicles | Adios to positive right of TM in Spain | Costs of Vestergaard Fransen v Bestnet Europe | Irish PTO on slogan TMs | Merpel summarises what’s going on with EPO | CoA for England and Wales on patent infringement by numbers… [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:55 am
Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
