Search for: "Birth v. Birth" Results 821 - 840 of 7,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2008, 10:31 am
Christy Kruszka (NFP) - "Christy Kruszka gave birth to Infant K. and executed a consent to adopt the next day. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 2:02 pm by Tom Goldstein
Carhart, effectively reversing a prior decision (Stenberg v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:26 am by SHG
The case arose as the result of several lesbian couples who conceived via artificial insemination; Indiana refused to list birth mothers’ wives on their children’s official birth certificates, but regularly listed birth mothers’ husbands on birth certificates without additional requirement. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 9:24 am
Dobson Laura Westra, The notion of immunity for pre-birth harms: maternal and beyond Jason P. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Almanac was to be the birth of Jack Benny, Valentines 1894. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:04 am
" In addition, the Court also announced its ruling in James v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 10:30 am by Brad Schnure
Ed Durr praised a decision by the United States Supreme Court overturning Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
”  Justice Kennedy seemingly reached the opposite conclusion in Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:04 pm
In any event, this turns out to have yielded a considerable amount of caselaw, most recently People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
DP 5/96 introduced the general presumption that deportation would not normally proceed in cases where a child, either from birth or an early age had accumulated 7 years or more continuous residence in the UK. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:00 am by JOHN VASSILLOU, MCGILL & CO
McGill & Co have been in the Supreme Court acting for the Respondent to the Government’s appeal in the case of The Advocate General for Scotland v Romein. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In Matter of Lynda D v Stacy C, it was held that the information before the court enables it to undertake a comprehensive independent review' of a custody or visitation issue, an evidentiary hearing is not required. [read post]