Search for: "Brake v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 5:01 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court has had numerous opportunities to put a brake on this level of jury control but apart from a lone dissenting voice of Ms. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 11:00 am by Schachtman
& Envt’l Health 287 (2013); David Steven Egilman, Emily Laura Ardolino, Samantha Howe, and Tess Bird, “Deconstructing a state-of-the-art review of the asbestos brake industry,” 21 New Solutions 545 (2011) [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 2:58 pm by Edward Smith
Black Box: Powerful Eye Witness in Car Accident Cases I’m Ed Smith, a Car Accident Attorney in Sacramento. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
(b) “Peace officer” means any undersheriff, deputy sheriff other than one appointed with authority only to receive and serve summons and civil process, police officer, Colorado state patrol officer, town marshal, or investigator for a district attorney or the attorney general who is engaged in full-time employment by the state, a city, city and county, town, judicial district, or county within this state. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 2:52 pm by Nathaniel Baca
(b) “Peace officer” means any undersheriff, deputy sheriff other than one appointed with authority only to receive and serve summons and civil process, police officer, Colorado state patrol officer, town marshal, or investigator for a district attorney or the attorney general who is engaged in full-time employment by the state, a city, city and county, town, judicial district, or county within this state. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
§43(a) was reaction of patent bar trying to put the brakes on what Rogers was trying to do in §44. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Looking around, we observe a political oligarchy (Congress) seamed with money and celebrity, hardly able to govern, increasingly irrelevant even as it remains at the heart of an old “republican” constitution; passionate demands (our commentators call them “populism”) for more than the state can summon the will or means to provide, from real economic security to dignity and recognition in a fragmented society (our commentators call it “polarization”),… [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:23 am by John Gregory
The answer to that is generally negative, thanks to the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling in Crookes v Newton in 2011. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
A unanimous Supreme Court overruled longstanding precedent established in Betts v. [read post]