Search for: "DOES 1-98 " Results 821 - 840 of 2,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2017, 4:16 am
The EPC Implementing Regulations were amended to include its main provisions and it is used as a supplementary means of interpretation (see Rule 26(1) EPC). [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:58 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
No. 112-98, pt. 1, at 39–40, 45 (2011), as re-printed in 2011 U.S.C.C.A.N. 67, 69, 75. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:35 am by Kluwer UPC News blogger
(…) The new provisions will apply with immediate effect starting on 1 July 2017. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 6:12 am by Jelle Hoekstra
The Directive excludes essentially biological processes from patentability but does not provide for a clear exclusion for plants or animals obtained from such processes. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 5:38 am by Sam Bray
But the Hebrew text does not label Cain’s action that way. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 4:47 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The following documents relied on in the first-instance opposition proceedings will be referred to in the present decision:D2: WO 98/11356D6: US 5,158,374Reasons for the Decision1. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 1:57 pm by Steven Boutwell
The bill does, however, restore the corporate income tax credit for state insurance premium taxes paid. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 6:35 am by Jan von Hein
The claimant does not loose priority as long as he applies for a second service accompanied by a due translation as soon as possible after the refusal. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:58 am by Scott Bomboy
In the current debate, the Senate passed Russia sanctions in a 98-2 vote and sent its bill along to the House for consideration. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:48 am by SHG
Pursuant to the Comprehensive Forfeiture Act of 1984, §303, 98 Stat.2045, 21 U. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
Introduction Sovereign conduct at the margins of the law, the title of the Symposium for which this essay was produced,[1] is perhaps no better manifested than in the commercial activities of states. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 2:55 am by INFORRM
The applicants, who were press professionals, had been in a position to obviate such risks without affecting the substance of the information which they had wished to disseminate [98]. [read post]