Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 821 - 840 of 6,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2019, 7:20 am by John Jascob
The amendments will become effective 90 days after publication in the Federal Register.  The release is No. 33-10648. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
As such, the TBA concluded that it had to apply Broccoli/Tomatoes II (G2/12 and G2/13) unless it had reasons to refer the decision for reconsideration by the EBA.The TBA further noted that whilst the AC has the power to amend the Articles of the EPC under Article 33(1)(b) EPC, the AC is not competent to amend the EPC by means of amendment of the implementing regulations (r. 33-35). [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
” [para 72]One of the artworks that Oslo municipality is trying to have registered as a trade mark:The Angry Boy (Sinnataggen)The rationale of the various absolute grounds for refusal of registrationAccording to the Court this also follows from consideration of how Article 3(1)(b) to (e) of the Trade Mark Directive acknowledges the need to keep a sign available for general use [para 73, referring to paragraphs 33 ff in the 2008 Opinion of AG Ruiz-Járabo… [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 5:25 pm by Chris Earley
Typically for personal injury cases the fee is 33%. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
In other words, both the United States and France were very clearly available forums under Articles 33(1) and 33(2) of Montreal. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:04 am
In other words, both the United States and France were very clearly available forums under Articles 33(1) and 33(2) of Montreal. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 2:37 pm
And on optimism, it's Obama by 2-1 60 percent say Obama's relationship with Ayers is not a legitimate issue in the presidential campaign; 37 percent say it is. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:50 am by Rosalind English
Ravat (Respondent) v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Limited (Appellant) (Scotland) [2012] UKSC 1 – read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled that an industrial tribunal does have the jurisdiction to consider a case of unfair dismissal of an employee who worked some of the time in Libya, job-sharing with another of the company’s employees. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 1:35 am by Giorgio Luceri
However, this general principle reaches its limits when it comes to Article 7(1)(c) EUTMR and should only apply to trade marks consisting of geographical names which are unknown to the public concerned – or at least unknown as designating a geographical place – or of names where, by reason of the nature of the place which they designate, it is unlikely that that public would believe that the category of goods or services in question originated there… [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am by INFORRM
In RST v UVW Tugendhat J identified the nature of the problem ([2009] EWHC 2448 (QB)[33]) At some point, the co [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The district court granted appellees’ motionsto dismiss for failure to state a claim and entered finaljudgment that claims 1–25 and 33–36 of the ’179 patentare ineligible for patenting under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 4:16 pm by Barry Herman
  On December 1, 2008, ALJ Rogers determined that the Respondents Lucky Litter and OurPet’s violated Section 337 based on the importation, sale for importation, or sale after importation of certain self-cleaning litter boxes and components thereof by reason of infringement of claim 33 of the ‘847 patent. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 11:55 am by Giles Peaker
On external windows, it is well established that they form part of the ‘structure and exterior’ for the purposes of s.11(1)(a) LTA 1985. [read post]