Search for: "Does 1-43"
Results 821 - 840
of 4,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2012, 6:16 am
The Secretary of State conceded that by January 1, 2015 only a further 23 areas were likely to achieve compliance with nitrogen dioxide emissions levels, so still nowhere the 43 required. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:01 pm
" A club does not "give up on a season" by trading the dead weight of one of the least productive regular players in the National League. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 11:21 am
Lexmark has crept into §43(a)(1)(A) via false endorsement; it will be interesting to see whether courts recognize that other trademark claims are likewise subject to a proximate cause requirement by that logic. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
This does not exclude the skilled person starting their considerations from any piece of prior art they might be aware of. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 7:19 pm
Last week, the American Statistical Association (ASA) released a special issue of its journal, The American Statistician, with 43 articles addressing the issue of “statistical significance. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
37 CFR § 2.119(b)(1)-(b)(4). [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 9:52 am
Id. at 542-43, 393 S.E.2d at 166. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 1:39 am
To prove a violation of Section 43(a) in a false endorsement case, a plaintiff must show that: (1) its mark is legally protectable; (2) it owns the mark; and (3) the defendant’s use of the mark to identify its goods or services is likely to create confusion concerning the plaintiff’s sponsorship or approval to those goods or services. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
The decision discusses alleged conflicting or at least diverging application of G 1/92, as well as G 1/92 itself, in detail. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
Does it encompass arbitration proceedings? [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 12:33 pm
Note that a §43(a)(1)(B) claim would require Famous Horse to allege (1) “commercial advertising or promotion” and (2) materiality, but no one seems interested in that right now. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
Instead of being included in PIPEDA by s. 4(1)(a), I would suggest that most search engines are excluded due to the operation of s. 4(2)(c) of PIPEDA: Limit (2) This Part does not apply to ... [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
That respect, however, does not mean that the domestic law of the Ontario Court has been ousted. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:13 pm
It was determined 1-3% of the contaminants were tremolite. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 10:50 am
Op. at ¶ 43. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
Held:1. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:57 am
Claim 1 of the main request reads:1. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:27 am
Such retaliation is prohibited by Pennsylvania’s Whistleblower Law, 43 P.S. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:08 am
”) Now, Reisinger does the right thing and gets a lawyer, Paul Bucher. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 6:52 pm
According to the taxpayer, under the circumstances described here above, the trust was actually terminated and the trust property was to be returned to the settlor, in accordance with article 43 of the governing law of the trust, which provides as follows: 43 Termination of a Jersey trust. (1) On the termination of a trust the trust property shall be distributed by the trustee within a reasonable time in accordance with the terms of the trust to the persons… [read post]
