Search for: "Foote v. Grant"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
ATTORNEY’S FEES ■Jose Parra, Applicant v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
In Prune v City & County of San Francisco (67 CalApp 5th 61) the City of San Francisco sought eminent domain and obtained title in 1951 to an 80-foot strip of land to construct a Hetch Hetchy pipeline to construct an underground pipeline conveying water to San Francisco from the grandparents of plaintiffs. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:15 pm
We grant the motion and conclude that the appellant has repeatedly engaged in extreme dilatory, disruptive, and threatening conduct that constitutes a forfeiture of his right to counsel for the limited remainder of the proceedings on appeal.The case is State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:03 pm
The plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed, and the defendant’s motion to dismiss was granted. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 9:51 am
First American Bank v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 9:01 am
Recently, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania made a decision in the matter of US Airways, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 5:27 am
Jan. 28, 2010)(marked "Not Precedential" by the Court), the plaintiffs claimed that their 1,000-foot private driveway was clearly marked with a "No Trespassing" sign. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 1:19 pm
And, this past May, in Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:05 am
In Martin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm
IBC Business Owners for Sensible Development v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 10:00 pm
However, on closer inspection, it's evident that GenRx made a few strategic errors which wrong footed them in court. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:17 pm
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 7:16 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:26 am
While the Board had granted variances for oversized, detached garages, it had permitted a maximum size of 1,500 square feet, much less than Carlson’s 2,140-square-foot garage. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
Accordingly, we affirm. * * * Because the evidence in the record supports all five of the statutory findings [necessary to the granting of a variance], we affirm the BZA's grant of the variance to Celebration. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 5:13 pm
Jasser v. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Rosie Burbidge reports on the Invista v Botes saga. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
Debord v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 4:46 am
A, R (o.t.a A) v. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 11:17 am
In a recent insurance policy case, Lance. v. [read post]
