Search for: "GRANT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 821 - 840 of 3,911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2011, 2:54 am by Melina Padron
Syed, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 (07 September 2011) Immigration: Court of Appeal confirms Article 8 ECHR need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Thole v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:29 am by Lyle Denniston
His order blocking enforcement is now under review by the Justices in the case of United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses Tuesday’s oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 2:18 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
The Department of Justice will take every lawful measure to vindicate the Department of Homeland Security’s lawful rescission of DACA. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm by Jennifer R. Dixon
Last month the Supreme Court issued what can only be deemed a landmark ruling, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm by Jennifer R. Dixon
Last month the Supreme Court issued what can only be deemed a landmark ruling, United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:40 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) by Defendants Loretta Lynch, United States Department of Justice; by Judge James L. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Department of Justice has filed a motion to make a private lawsuit simply disappear. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
Barrett’s willingness to look past possible abuse of discretion and violation of due process decried by the dissenting judges echoes Chief Justice John Roberts’s deferential reasoning in Trump v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
Capital punishment in the United States is often considered in terms of its constitutional vulnerability. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:06 am by Max Kohn
The United States and California justice department’s alleged that CenCal, Cottage, Sansum, and CHC violated the FCA and California False Claims Act by submitting claims for “Enhanced Services” from Medi-Cal for services that were not eligible. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm by NARF
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974; Administrative Procedure Act) United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:43 pm by Amy Howe
Circuit “transformed the expropriation exception into a vast grant of federal jurisdiction over foreign states. [read post]