Search for: "Golden v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 1,896
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2014, 4:35 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
Supreme Court’s recognized in concurring opinions in United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 2:45 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 714 F.3d 1311,1315 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm by Cyrus Farivar
Cyrus Farivar On Thursday, the California Supreme Court upheld the admissibility of images taken from red light cameras as evidence of traffic violations in the Golden State. [read post]
30 May 2014, 11:56 am by Amanda Frost
  But they note that the Court’s five-four decision in Vance v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:37 am by The Book Review Editor
The first guerrilla organizers were dissident army officers, appalled by their country’s subservience to U.S. interests, and then university intellectuals, shut out of electoral politics by state repression of the left. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am by Bruce Ackerman
Our disagreement – not a small one -- is whether We the People only did great things during the Golden Age before the New Deal. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
They feared it would set a disastrous higher lawmaking precedent: After all, requiring the abolition of poll taxes in federal, but not state, elections represented a relatively minor incursion on state sovereignty. [read post]
8 May 2014, 8:42 am by Rick Hills
In particular, local agencies should not be subject to the same strict non-delegation doctrine by which state agencies are arguably constrained under Boreali v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:33 am by Eric S. Solotoff
If you read today’s New York Daily News (or Post for that matter), the answer to these questions was a resounding NO in the case of Schacter v. [read post]