Search for: "Grant v. Commonwealth" Results 821 - 840 of 1,620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2014, 5:10 am
Commonwealth, supra.The Court of Appeals then noted that the Kentucky Supreme Court decided McAtee v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 4:36 pm
But this issue is even more complicated because there is some authority, such as the Ninth Circuit’s Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am by Cicely Wilson
Accordingly, the order of the Superior Court was reversed, and the trial court’s orders were reinstated.Read More: PA Supreme Court denies prisoner’s right to expungeCounty of Grant v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 1:26 pm
We watched with great interest as the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reviewed the case of Cruz v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm by Patricia Salkin
The Objector appealed the ZBA’s decision to the court of common pleas which affirmed the decision, but the Commonwealth Court reversed, finding that the ZBA “improperly found that a unique hardship existed,” and its grant of the variances was not based on substantial evidence. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Jan. 11, 2013), reconsideration granted, No. 1101397 (Ala. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:43 am by Marguerite Kenner
On 3 July, four days following the Hobby Lobby decision, the Court granted an injunction application in Wheaton College v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cummins, Esq.FOLEY, COMERFORD & CUMMINSScranton, PAEvery so often in Pennsylvania jurisprudence, an appellate court criminal law decision comes along that could serve to have a substantial impact on the litigation of Pennsylvania personal injury matters.For instance, in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:18 am
Such a case was recently decided by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Ace Wire Spring and Form Company v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
" In the case of Commonwealth v Anderson, 406 Mass 343, 547 NE2d 1134 [1989], the Supreme Court of Massachusetts held that the Commonwealth must carefully comply with written, checkpoint guidelines and that "substantial compliance" is not the standard for a roadblock seizure. [read post]