Search for: "Holland v. State" Results 821 - 840 of 908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Eggers, III of Holland & Hart, LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Standard International Management v EUIPO Case T-768/20 EU General Court (July 2022)Can a hotel in the United States use an EU trade mark? [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
However, the French Judge refers to a statement made by Judge Holland, which nuances this “binary” conclusion on the strict distinction between companies, stating that in certain hypotheses, the law of the State of Delaware (in which both BMS Pharma and BMS Company are incorporated) allows “the corporate veil to be lifted”, which results from an attestation, and is confirmed by Judge Chandler’s testimony. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(Stanford University)Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)Banerjee Abhijit V. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 3:36 am by SHG
“It was very interesting today, hearing your argument in Holland v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:16 pm by Gideon Alper
Most other states in the country ban gay marriage too, so domestic partnerships in those states are important in the same way they are in Florida. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am by Adam Chandler
Based on Justice Scalia’s questions in last week’s argument in Doe v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
Indeed, Holland and other leading Southerners made the Twenty-Fourth Amendment central to their constitutional case against the Voting Rights Act of 1965 – arguing that some of its sweeping provisions, most notably a ban on poll taxes in state and local elections, were unconstitutional without the enactment of another formal amendment. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 10:56 am by Schachtman
Supreme Court Uproots Weeds in Garden State’s Law of Expert Witnesses” (Aug. 8, 2018). 4 2018 WL 3636867, at *20 (citing the Reference Manual 3d ed., at 597-99). 5 Cook v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
In the 9thCircuit, the IP exemption means federal IP; other circuits, and even California state law, include state based IP claims.Dogan: Need to argue on two levels: if yo [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]