Search for: "Housing Authority v. Superior Court" Results 821 - 840 of 974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Requisitions for the surrender of fugitives from justice shall be made by the respective diplomatic agents of the contracting parties, or in the event of the absence of these from the country, or its seat of government, they may be made by superior consular officers. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The forgery or falsification of the official acts of the Government or public authority, including courts of justice, or the uttering or fraudulent use of the same. 13. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  What I learned was the legitimacy of multiple interpretations, that both the House of Hillel and House of Shammai articulate the voice of the living God, even though they differed on almost every substantial issue. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
.  A3208 Aubry (MS) -- Extends protection from discrimination to current employees and licensees SUMM : Amd SS750 - 753, Cor L Extends protection from discrimination to current employees and licensees; establishes written statements shall include an explanation of how the employer weighed certain factors upon denial or revocation of license or denial or termination of employment. 01/23/07 referred to correction02/13/07 reported02/22/07 advanced to third reading cal.45 LAW /… [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by Jackie McDermott and Lana Ulrich
French argued that the governing case here is the Supreme Court case Employment Division v. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am by Kelly Buchanan
” 1863: The New Zealand Settlements Act, which authorized the government to confiscate land from certain tribes without compensation, was passed. 1877: In Wi Parata v The Bishop of Wellington, the chief justice of the Supreme Court declared the Treaty to be “worthless” and a “simple nullity. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has issued decisions making any such reforms difficult to adopt and enforce. [read post]