Search for: "Howe v. Tax Commission" Results 821 - 840 of 1,363
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) require an analysis of how existing environmental conditions will impact future residents or users (receptors) of a proposed project? [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm by Kelly
Sojuzplodoimport v Spirits Int’l N.V (Property, intangible) District Court N D Illinois: Proof of paying sales tax and tracking sales are not enough control for trademark licensing: Eva’s Bridal Ltd. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 4:45 am
Supreme Court 's 2004 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Department of Education encourage testing and clarify guidance on how schools should address lead in their drinking water. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 10:53 am
Electric Wonderland does receive commissions on sales it brokers.... [read post]
8 May 2025, 5:38 pm by Steven Calabresi
Imagine how the Democrats would react if President Trump were faced with a liberal Supreme Court majority and therefore created a Commission to examine "reforming" the "membership" of the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Mar 2025, 12:04 pm
” The Schools, Health and Libraries Coalition, which is also defending the E-rate program, adds that even before the Supreme Court’s 2024 decision in Loper-Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm by Erin Miller
Alabama Department of Revenue Docket: 09-520 Issue: Whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors, but not railroads, from a generally applicable sales and use tax is subject to challenge as “another tax that discriminates against a rail carrier” under Section 306(1)(d) of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
In the aftermath of such an enforcement action, how might the audit firm respond? [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that impose significant additional procedural and disclosure requirements on initial public offerings (IPOs) by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in business combination transactions involving SPACs (de-SPACs). [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 9:07 pm by The Regulatory Review
CPSC lack standing to challenge the Commission’s removal protection. [read post]