Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF A SUBPOENA." Results 821 - 840 of 1,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2019, 8:40 am by Kia Rahnama
Traditionally, Congress has used its contempt power to punish those who refuse to comply with duly issued subpoenas. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 11:58 am by Vishnu Kannan
Collaborates with GS Communication staff on matters pertaining to public/private events and GS Development staff on matters pertaining to donor proposals. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 5:16 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  The process will have a big impact on your life, and your input matters. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 5:16 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  The first deadline that arises for people charged with a Minneapolis DWI is the seven day temporary license they are provided with by the law enforcement officer. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 2:12 pm by JacksonWhite Law
Law enforcement can also access historical IP address records after getting an administrative subpoena. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 12:37 pm by Vishnu Kannan
Quinta Jurecic shared a draft resolution seeking to streamline the enforcement of subpoenas, which the House will consider on June 11. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
  While Congress can issue subpoenas and hold individuals in contempt for failure to abide by those subpoenas, any power to hold such individuals in criminal contempt lies with DOJ, not Congress. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Episode Notes: International Grand Committee on Big Data, Privacy and Democracy Credits: CBC, Politicians Grill Facebook, Google, Twitter over Privacy, DisinformationCBC, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg Ignores Subpoena to Appear at Privacy Hearing Transcript: LawBytes Podcast – Episode 14 | Convert audio-to-text with Sonix Michael Geist: This is Law Bytes, a podcast with Michael Geist. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
The issues now dominating the nation’s attention have moved the Court into uncharted territory, where pet conservative – and for that matter, pet liberal -- jurisprudential axioms offer little or no guidance. [read post]
29 May 2019, 10:18 am by Benjamin Wittes
The administration refuses compliance with subpoenas even where clear statutes specifically require the production of the information in question. [read post]
28 May 2019, 10:56 am by William Ford
Collaborates with GS Communication staff on matters pertaining to public/private events and GS Development staff on matters pertaining to donor proposals. [read post]
23 May 2019, 9:30 pm by Alana Bevan
Chen noted that FDA has been inconsistent in its enforcement of certain rules, which require manufacturers of stem cell therapies to apply to FDA for approval of the therapies as drugs. [read post]
22 May 2019, 3:34 pm by Jonathan Shaub
” Judicial resolution could take time, but a suit seeking to enforce this particular subpoena for testimony could feasibly be resolved rather quickly. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:55 pm by Quinta Jurecic
He’s ordering his subordinates not to comply with subpoenas and not to appear as witnesses. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am by Lyle Denniston
The subpoena at issue only mandates the delivery of documents, not personal testimony of witnesses. [read post]
20 May 2019, 7:45 am by William Ford
Collaborates with GS Communication staff on matters pertaining to public/private events and GS Development staff on matters pertaining to donor proposals. [read post]
19 May 2019, 3:22 am by SHG
One would expect that no judge with even a modest grasp of the First Amendment would sign off on such a subpoena, or if issued by an attorney without prior approval, enforce it. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:01 pm by Jim Sedor
The distinction means Durham for now will not wield the sort of law enforcement powers that come with an open criminal investigation, such as the ability to subpoena documents and compel witnesses to testify. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:56 pm by Margaret Taylor
Consovoy acknowledges that the court wouldn’t want to get “into the weeds” of legislation but argues that the judge can’t ignore that the investigation is really a law enforcement matter not properly addressed by Congress. [read post]