Search for: "In Re Brand" Results 821 - 840 of 14,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2014, 4:50 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
 and French Wine Company Castel Frères to Pursue Trademark Battle Against Panati in China’s Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:46 am by Tim Sitzmann
Normally when we talk about stripes trademarks , we’re talking about iconic sportswear brand adidas. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 1:35 pm by divi
They’re part of a company’s brand, and that’s worth defending if someone else is illegally copying it. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 7:29 am
Dear Rich: We're brand-new to the world of business and we've already had to "cease and desist" our use of our first name. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 2:02 pm
If you’re a little overwhelmed at work right now, take... [read post]
28 May 2010, 12:31 pm by Wendell Sherk, Missouri Attorney
  If you’re getting stretched financially, you probably shouldn’t take advantage of this “benefit. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:53 pm
Applicant ProMark Brands, Inc. sought to register the marks ORE-IDA STEAM N' MASH and STEAM N' MASH for "processed potatoes," but Examining Attorneys Kathleen H. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Today we’re expanding Business Messages in Maps and Search to support all kinds of businesses, and giving them the ability to integrate Business Messages directly with their customer service platforms. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:00 am by Ji Sook Yim, Editor
Sources: Pet Predicament In re Pet Food Products Liability Litigation [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 8:00 am by Theo Francis
At least, we’re pretty sure they did. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 8:21 am by Marina Chafa
Klaus, Partner at Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig, & Brian Medich, Associate Attorney at Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig We’re in the year 2020! [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 8:33 pm by Steve Baird
It appears this visual identity change began for Ball Park, at least as early as April 2000, although the amendment to the original all capital letter rendition of the mark was not filed until April 2004), as shown here in the oldest registration existing for this mark (note the defensive “brand” reference built right into the amended mark):  If you’re going to go all lower case, it’s probably a good idea to add the brand… [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
We're glad to see that Rachel Brand has managed to steer clear of this whole mess, with her excellent reputation intact, and her dazzling career prospects undimmed by this controversy. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 2:13 pm by Kaiser
But let's face it, you're not going to fall for the ol' tell me about your product and its benefits routine. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 9:06 am by Matt Miller, Registered Patent Attorney
Can someone besides the original company make the old brand come back? [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am by Marc Whipple
It is an old principle, recently re-affirmed in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:00 pm
Similarly, if you're using one but not the other - will it be susceptible to removal for non-use? [read post]