Search for: "In Re Martinez"
Results 821 - 840
of 855
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
ITERATIVE DISJUNCTIVE SYLLOGISM Basic propositional logic teaches that the disjunctive syllogism (modus tollendo ponens) is a valid argument, in which one of its premises is a disjunction (P v Q), and the other premise is the negation of one of the disjuncts: P v Q ~P_____ ∴ Q See Irving Copi & Carl Cohen Introduction to Logic at 362 (2005). [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 7:50 pm
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
Pending resolution of Elonis, the Court appears to be holding the case’s twice-relisted doppelganger, Martinez v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW.Cannon, Jonathan. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
To view the full-text of cases you must sign in to FindLaw.com. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:30 pm
Indeed, the point of disagreement with the concurring opinion in Jones was the re-emergence of a trespass theory for Fourth Amendment searches rather than application of existing reasonable expectation of privacy doctrine. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Martinez-Melgar, No. 08-4569 Sentence on a defendant convicted of drug trafficking and firearm possession is vacated and remanded for resentencing as the district court clearly erred in concluding, on the basis of the record, that defendant's admission of guilt occurred in a judicial proceeding in open court, and as such, certain criminal history points should not have been assessed. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Martinez-Melgar, No. 08-4569 Sentence on a defendant convicted of drug trafficking and firearm possession is vacated and remanded for resentencing as the district court clearly erred in concluding, on the basis of the record, that defendant's admission of guilt occurred in a judicial proceeding in open court, and as such, certain criminal history points should not have been assessed. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
The official worst heat-wave ever is now over in both the U.S. and France, but Sirius is still rising just before dawn and nothing has cooled off in the courts. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:00 pm
But as a whole, at the end of the four hours, I have to say I was disappointed by its lack of analysis and contextualization of who we are, where we are at now, where we're going. [read post]
Media Law Review of the Year 2011: Defamation, Contempt, Privacy and a Public Inquiry – Jude Townend
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm
But if you do, yet still allow your editors to use inciteful over insightful language, then far from standing up for Britain, you’re a menace against all things that make it great“. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
Ed. 2d 990 (2015) (joined opinion) “district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that prisoners failed to establish substantial likelihood of success on the merits of Eighth Amendment challenge” Martinez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 10:26 am
Martinez, No. 01-07-00363-CV, 2008 WL 5392023, at *2 n.4 (Tex. [read post]
12 May 2022, 8:58 am
A significant question facing the House Select Committee investigating the attack on the U.S. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:21 am
As one victim of a foreclosure rescue scam said, “When you’re down and out you’ll believe anything. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:33 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Martinez-Larraga, No. 06-40489 "Convictions and sentences for drug-related offenses are affirmed over claims that: 1) the prosecutor commented on their post-arrest, pre-trial, silence during its rebuttal closing argument; 2) the government improperly bolstered its witnesses' testimony during closing argument; and 3) the district court erred by denying one defendant a downward adjustment of his base offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 3B1.2. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
The Supreme Court has re-affirmed this common law framework in the Warren case and its progeny like Castle Rock, etc. [read post]
