Search for: "In re F. E." Results 821 - 840 of 7,237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2017, 11:04 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Aug. 1, 2017) (quoting In re Rijckaert, 9 F.3d 1531, 1534 (Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:05 am by Michael Feit
Allerdings bejaht das Bundesgericht seit langem, dass eine Schiedsklausel unter gewissen Voraussetzungen auch Personen binden kann, die den Vertrag nicht unterzeichnet haben und darin auch nicht erwähnt werden, so etwa bei der Abtretung einer Forderung, bei einer (einfachen oder kumulativen) Schuldübernahme oder bei einer Vertragsübernahme (BGE 134 III 565 E. 3.2 S. 567 f.; 129 III 727 E. 5.3.1 S. 735). [read post]
29 May 2013, 3:10 am by John L. Welch
TTABlog note: For a collection of Section 2(e)(2) postings, go here.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 3:11 am
In re The Pennsylvania State University, Serial Nos. 88311154 and 88311234 (March 9, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Frances S. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 1:35 pm
O'Brien (In re O'Brien), 312 F.3d 1135, 1137 (9th Cir. 2002). [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 5:01 am by by PritzkerLaw
Cook hamburger to at least 160°F and cook chicken and turkey to 180°F. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:35 am by John L. Welch
In re Scripps Networks, Inc., Serial No. 77418854 (April 27, 2010) [not precedential].As to Scripps' television program (last broadcast in 1999), the Board pointed out that Scripps did not claim transferred acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:03 am by admin
La loi Fédérale dicte que les hôpitaux ne peuvent pas refuser les soins d’urgence à quelque personne que se soit même si elle est entrée illégalement dans le pays. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 4:32 pm
 Au moment de son engagement, l'intéressée n'avait pas de compétence en matière de programmation informatique. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 10:45 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
F – Tribe’s Memo iso Motion for Partial SJ re 1994 Reaffirmation of Rights Prior posts here. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 2:33 am by John L. Welch
Since "[a] term that names the central focus or subject matter of the services is generic for the services themselves," the Board affirmed the genericness refusal.Mere Descriptiveness: For the sake of completeness, and assuming that TIRES TIRES TIRES is not generic, the Board considered the Section 2(e)(1) issue, including Applicant claim of acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f). [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
 La division d'opposition était d'avis que les trois critères des inventions de sélection n'étaient pas respectés : la plage 0-100 n'était ni étroite, ni éloignée du domaine préféré de D1 (100-300 ppm), ni motivée. [read post]