Search for: "Johnson v. State of California" Results 821 - 840 of 1,507
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2012, 7:43 am by Conor McEvily
Johnson, the Court summarily reversed a decision of the Third Circuit, holding that the court of appeals failed to accord sufficient respect to the determination of the jury and the Pennsylvania state courts that there was enough evidence to convict respondent Lorenzo Johnson for his role in a 1995 murder. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:13 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 Scott Johnson of PCT Law Group on the firm's Virginia Business Law Update Jared Loughner Facing Federal and State Death Penalty Charges: Indigent Defense Appointments Made for Death Qualified Counsel - Criminal law lawyer Terry Lenamon blog on his blog, Terry Lenamon on the Death Penalty Green Roof Benefits and Risks: Music City Center in Nashville May Have Both - Construction attorney Matt DeVries of the Best Practices Construction Law Blog … [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Thus, in California, while “an FDA[] conclusion is not binding . [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
  For other Texas (and other states’) cases applying the learned intermediary rule to prescription medical devices, see our post here.Collectively, strike one.Second, Texas’ rejection of design defect claims involving prescription medical products is also reflected in that state’s product liability statute. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 11:39 am by John Elwood
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities California – CalPERS Board Violated Open Meetings Law, Judge Rules. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
City of Bakersfield, California v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:52 pm
      And yet actual facts and law presented at the conference didn't really support this position:  California Associate Justice Ming Chin's presentation on Johnson v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:16 am
Johnson, whose ImmigrationProf blog post on this issue is here) [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am by John Elwood
If that rings a bell for you, it’s either tinnitus or because the Court already invalidated the Armed Career Criminal Act’s residual clause in Johnson v. [read post]