Search for: "KELLY v. STATE"
Results 821 - 840
of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
And, while Young v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:34 am
As to the penalty imposed, termination, the court said that “Under the circumstances, termination is not a sanction shocking to our sense of fairness,” citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://nypublicpersonnellawarchives.blogspot.com/2007/02/discipline-not-barred-by-availability.html=======================The Discipline Book, - a concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State is a… [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 9:17 am
In ruling that an insured’s bad faith claims against its insurer are governed by a ten-year prescriptive period, the Smith Court relied heavily on Kelly v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:30 am
” Kelly v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 6:18 am
Pivotal Software, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 4:09 am
He also sued Hartman and Swinehart in state court. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:06 am
Conrad v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:54 pm
They pointed out that despite Chief Justice Kelly and Justice Hathaway’s assertions to the contrary, no other state has adopted this “appearance of impropriety” standard. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:22 pm
Kelly (divorce, custody)In re M.H. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 2:30 pm
Clair, Jr. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Mike Kelly and others: Kelly v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
The Court also released Chief Justice Kelly’s concurring opinion in Duncan v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
"* In Kelly v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 7:32 am
Today you posted a reader's reaction to the Indiana Supreme Court's opinion in Mullins v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 12:09 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:47 am
--Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of IllinoisOpinion Date: 2/26/10Cite: Viad Corp. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 2:32 pm
Kelly. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
