Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 821 - 840 of 21,104
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2019, 10:35 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
In a Maryland personal injury case, the jury typically determines not only whether the defendant should be liable for the plaintiff’s injuries, but also the amount of damages that the plaintiff is entitled to. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 1:05 pm by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
The Plaintiff’s Decedent’s Care and the Plaintiff’s Claims Allegedly, the plaintiff’s decedent was treated by the defendants for a brain tumor. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:12 pm by Eric Beasley
When a person engaging in activities arising out of his or her employment causes a motor vehicle collision, not only may the person be held liable for any harm caused by the accident but in many cases, the person’s employer may be held liable as well. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 3:00 am by Matthew Lerner
Vanmaltke, the Appellate Division, Second Department held that the defendant driver was not liable regarding a collision of the plaintiff's truck or the one in which the plaintiff was rear-ended by another tractor trailer. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:08 am by Earl Drott
The contract stated, in part, that she could not sell the vehicle or leave it in someone else’s care without the defendant dealership’s express permission. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 4:36 pm by Matthew Vance
  A recent ruling by a federal district court granted a defendants motion to dismiss New Mexico wrongful death claims on the basis that the defendants conduct was not the proximate cause of the death. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 10:28 am by John C. Manoog III
Of course, the defendant will likely deny that it should be held liable for the plaintiff’s slip and fall accident, pointing the finger back at the plaintiff for the accident or denying that the dangerous condition described by the plaintiff even existed. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
["The Court cannot punish or hold Defendants liable merely for publishing a summary of Plaintiff's disciplinary action and their commentary about that decision. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 11:09 am by Eugene Volokh
["The Court cannot punish or hold Defendants liable merely for publishing a summary of Plaintiff's disciplinary action and their commentary about that decision. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:53 am by Barry Sookman
I reject Google’s contention that a defendant can only ever be a publisher if the defendant authorises or accepts responsibility for the publication… Google was the sole operator and controller of the Google website. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:56 am
  Potential Defendants in Dog Bite Cases  While the dog owner is usually the primary defendant in a dog bite case, there are circumstances where other parties may also be held liable for the victim's injuries:  Property Owners or Landlords  If a dog bite occurs on rented property, the landlord or property owner may be held liable if they were aware of the dog's dangerous tendencies and failed to take appropriate… [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 8:01 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
However, Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company (Ironshore), BSR’s insurer, negligence claims against the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:15 am
Nevertheless, the Court ruled that MAI could be liable for the statement made by Brooks in an action brought under ADEA, so long as Brooks had been authorized by MAI to interview job applicants and make hiring decisions on MAI's behalf. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:07 pm
The defendant has asserted that it is not liable for the trip and fall accident. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 10:30 am by Eric Goldman
That’s a good result for the First Amendment and defendants generally, but it’s not something defendants can categorically rely upon. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:34 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Thus, a defendant may not be liable if the plaintiff’s injuries resulted only because of very unusual and unexpected circumstances. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:48 am
The trial court agreed with the plaintiff’s argument and did not limit her to the schedule and held that the defendant was liable for workers’ compensation benefits to the employee. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An employer may be vicariously liable for an allegedly slanderous statement made by its employee2017 NY Slip Op 05353, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe Plaintiff in this action against a village and an employee of the village [Defendants] alleged that an employee of the village made defamatory remarks*concerning the Plaintiff in the course of her employment as an administrative assistant of the village.Addressing appeals concerning the disposition of motions for summary… [read post]