Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE" Results 821 - 840 of 42,183
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2024, 2:45 pm by Francesca Blackard
The appeals court held there was evidence supporting the trial court’s ruling the wife rebutted the presumption against maintenance. [read post]
14 May 2024, 11:55 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Each state has its own distinct rules governing witness statements. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:59 am by Tobin Admin
Walmart appealed, contending that the nominal damages awarded were excessive as a matter of law. [read post]
14 May 2024, 7:58 am by Mark Keenan
This could involve keeping a written statement or evidence that the benefactor intended the inheritance to be for you alone and not for the marital estate. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:17 pm by melody
In Texas, this privilege is governed by the Texas Rules of Evidence 503 and the Federal Rule of Evidence 501. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:17 pm by melody
In Texas, this privilege is governed by the Texas Rules of Evidence 503 and the Federal Rule of Evidence 501. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:17 pm by melody
In Texas, this privilege is governed by the Texas Rules of Evidence 503 and the Federal Rule of Evidence 501. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Still, defendants argued that their speech was on a matter of public concern, so the court couldn’t resolve the misrepresentation claims without addressing whether the First Amendment protected the advertising. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Substantial evidence in this context means some credible evidence" (Matter of Maxwell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 210 AD3d 1095, 1096 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Substantial evidence in this context means some credible evidence" (Matter of Maxwell v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 210 AD3d 1095, 1096 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
No competent lawyer would advise him to do so after Merchan’s rulings. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm by Benson Varghese
The claimant is 1-50% at fault: Under Texas’s modified comparative fault rule, if the claimant is 50% or less at fault, they can still recover damages from the other party, but their payout will be reduced proportionally to their percentage of fault. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm by Benson Varghese
The claimant is 1-50% at fault: Under Texas’s modified comparative fault rule, if the claimant is 50% or less at fault, they can still recover damages from the other party, but their payout will be reduced proportionally to their percentage of fault. [read post]
12 May 2024, 6:59 pm by Benson Varghese
The claimant is 1-50% at fault: Under Texas’s modified comparative fault rule, if the claimant is 50% or less at fault, they can still recover damages from the other party, but their payout will be reduced proportionally to their percentage of fault. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:53 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
These rules could include appointing a skilled lawyer to represent their interests, demanding stronger evidence, or allowing for appeals if the defendant later resurfaces. [read post]
12 May 2024, 8:00 am by jonathanturley
No competent lawyer would advise him to do so after Merchan’s rulings. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Relevant provisions on protecting confidential information in the UPC between the parties in the proceedings (Article 58 Unified Patent Court Agreement (UPCA) and Rule 262A Rules of Procedure (RoP)) Article 58 UPCA sets out the ground principles for the protection of confidential information in the UPC:“To protect the trade secrets, personal data or other confidential information of a party to the proceedings or of a third party, or to prevent an abuse of evidence,… [read post]