Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 821 - 840
of 10,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2012, 8:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 5:06 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 10:17 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 10:43 pm
This marks the first Second Amendment case considered by the United States Supreme Court since 1939. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
The Board is directed to decide the case on the record before it, and that duty may not be delegated to another body.Conclusion: Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found that VAGISAN is not likely to cause confusion with opposer's mark VAGISIL.Bona Fide Intent to Use: Applicant had not advertised or sold its products in the United States, nor did it have a written marketing plan for the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
The United States Supreme Court had just decided Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
Evidence of third-party use of similar marks was “thin” (FocusVision Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 1:13 am
Today marks five months from ACCA’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 9:40 am
United States, the crack v. powdered cocaine sentencing case. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 1:03 pm
Adds the IPKat, it is not always appreciated that, unlike oppositions under the Community trade mark system, which can only be made on relative grounds where the opposition is founded on the existence of an earlier registered or unregistered right, oppositions in the United Kingdom can (as in this instance) also be made on absolute grounds of refusal. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:56 am
United States to explore this topic of concurrences, precedential complexities, and confusion. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 4:23 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am
In December 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in a standard essential patent (SEP) appeal involving Ericsson and TCL Communication Technology—a closely watched case that many thought would shed light on what constitutes a FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) offer of a licensing royalty rate relative to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:04 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:43 am
The court then holds that Marks v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Martin, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY, Mark W. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Martin, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY, Mark W. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:17 pm
Upon information and belief, more than 232 million turkeys are consumed in the United States in each year. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
