Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2015, 7:47 am
Reactions to grant of cert. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Whirlpool Corp, the trial court did, however, permit the plaintiff to conduct a supplemental deposition of the defense expert witness to question him about his calculations[15]. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:33 am
Only about 1 in 100 cert petitions succeeds. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
As a constitutional law case, the decision tees up the question whether the purpose and effect prongs of the undue burden standard set forth in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
(And does it matter?) [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
Chatman, 14-8589, involved a notoriously complicated question related to Ylst v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
The Justices denied Allstate’s petition for cert raising questions about the Rule 23 class action commonality requirement and due process rights. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Instead, the question the Court has always asked is, if Congress has the Article I power to proscribe the conduct in question, whether an exception to the Constitution's jury-trial clauses justifies subjecting the [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
And since there is no greater longshot than a cert. petition, this should be a good week for relists. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
At IMLA’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Monday’s cert. grant in the class action case Tyson Foods v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
The order denying cert. in Manzano v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
Cir. 2013), here, and noted the cert. petition here (item #5). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:18 pm
Rev. 225, 238 (2012) ("Most of the Texas courts of appeals and federal courts that have considered the question under Texas law have rejected the existence of an independent cause of action for unjust enrichment. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
IN ADMIRALTY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW RE EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON MAINTENANCE AND CURE This matter came on for an evidentiary hearing, before the Court, sitting without a jury, on May 14, 2015. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:38 am
Town of Gilbert, 707 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir. 2012), cert. granted, 134 S. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
The petition asks whether “the Fourth Circuit contravene[d] § 2254 (d)(1) when it granted habeas relief on the ground that the North Carolina state courts unreasonably applied ‘clearly established’ law when they held that third-party religious discussions with jurors did not concern ‘the matter[s] pending before the jury[.] [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:27 pm
” That sentence gets to the heart of the matter. [read post]
26 May 2015, 8:19 am
Andy Sayler, Samuelson-Glushko Technology Law & Policy Clinic at Colorado Law: Heartbleed, Shellshock, numerous vulnerabilities in the last year. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:17 pm
Commonality is satisfied if there are common questions of law or fact, the court explained, and all that is required is that the employees identify a single, significant question. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
dissent from denial of cert.?) [read post]
