Search for: "Matter of Goldstein"
Results 821 - 840
of 974
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
Because, as a statistical matter, a CVSG increases the odds of a grant in a paid case forty-six-fold, it is the next best thing to a grant. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 2:17 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.] [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm
There, the solicitor general recommends the court dismiss the bill of complaint and not let the matter proceed. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:55 pm
Securities Litigation Blog Dealing with securities-related matters, and authored by attorneys John Jordak and Susan Hurd of Alston & Bird. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Data and Privacy Melissa Goldstein, George Washington University, Redefining “Sensitive” Data Efthimios Parasidis, The Ohio State University, Rethinking Health Data Ethics Nicholson Price, University of Michigan, Data Fungibility Jennifer Wagner, Geisinger Health System, Precision Health and the Role of the FTC 6:00–7:30 PM Welcome Reception & Chicago Pizza Tasting - Kasbeer Hall, Corboy Law Center, 15th Floor Sponsored by the DePaul College of Law Mary and Michael… [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:12 pm
Vopper, in which the Supreme Court found that the First Amendment prevented punishment of republication by third parties of illegally recorded conversations when the recordings were on a matter of public interest. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 3:34 am
He’s human, no matter how much you adore the Innocence Project. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 7:04 am
Added SEC Powers In direct response to the Goldstein decision, the administration proposes to amend Advisers Act Section 211 to allow the agency to ascribe different meanings to terms used in the Act (specifically the term “client”), and to prescribe different regulations for different classes of persons or matters within its jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 7:59 am
., citing Goldstein Garber & Salama, LLC v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 9:40 am
While in law school, Professors Paul Brest and Paul Goldstein reinforced my interest in a career path that would veer toward government service and policy issues. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Steir, Chairman and CEO of Studley, Howard Nottingham, Executive Managing Director of Studley, and David Goldstein, Executive Vice President of Studley represented WilmerHale. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 11:08 am
If the justices agree that the agencies are seeking to defy the act’s text, that would seem to put the matter easily to rest. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 7:06 am
Goldstein and fellow residents and business owners in Brooklyn have asked the court of appeals to reconsider its Atlantic Yards ruling after it rules on Harlem. [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 10:53 am
Lesson Learned From Recent Lawsuits and Court Decisions The main issue threaded through each of these actions is the matter of consumer consent. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
(Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, were among the counsel to the petitioner in Allshouse.) [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
Justices Scalia and Thomas would have gone even further than that, and stated in a concurring opinion that even if Salinas had invoked his right to be silent, it would not have mattered because nothing the police did required him to give self-incriminating testimony. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in this case.] [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 10:26 am
Board of Education in 1968, the First Amendment has protected public employees from adverse employment actions when they are “speaking as a citizen” on a matter of public concern. [read post]
