Search for: "New Doe Child #1 v. United States"
Results 821 - 840
of 1,535
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
Our last new relist, Virginia v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm
Volokh also wrote that the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 9:14 am
United States v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Application of the Existing Indian Family Doctrine prior to Holyfield Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 4:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am
Case in which the United States recently filed an amicus brief in response to the Court’s call for the views of the Solicitor General: Title: Missouri Gas Energy v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
Davis, No. 06-666 In the context of states/subdivisions' exemption of interest on their own bonds from their state income taxes, which are imposed on bond interest from other states, the Court rules that Kentucky's version of such a differential tax scheme does not offend the Commerce Clause. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am
” Last fall the Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
------- Title: New Process Steel v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 7:10 pm
McNeil Docket: 11-295 Issue: (1) Whether the court below properly held that counsel’s failure to strike an openly biased juror does not constitute objectively unreasonable performance under Strickland v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 3:10 pm
” The report examines the practices concerning this question in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, and the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/64936-1.pub.doc.pdf Division Two Court of Appeals: State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am
United States, 13-9972, concerning a similar issue. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 12:16 pm
The following Declaration was then adopted: On 23-25 March 2010, more than 50 judges and other experts from Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Egypt, Germany, India, Mexico, New Zealand, Pakistan, Spain, United Kingdom and the United States of America, including experts from the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, met in Washington, D.C. to discuss cross-border family… [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:38 pm
(2) Whether United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 7:01 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 10:59 pm
F.S. 922.105(1). [read post]
