Search for: "P V Holding Corporation" Results 821 - 840 of 1,781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Disproportionate effort: the obligation to respond to a wide-ranging SAR In some previous case law the courts have on occasion been willing to reject “disproportionate” requests, or those which apparently attempt to circumvent standard disclosure (see for example, Ezsias v Welsh Ministers [2007] All ER (D) 65, Elliot v Lloyds TSB Bank PLC [2012] EW Misc 7 (CC) and Durant v Financial Services Authority [2004] FSR 28)  In contrast, in AB the obligation… [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, heard 3-4 May 2017. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Unlike traditional corporations with well-entrenched structures, DAOs often find themselves tasked with crafting their governance frameworks. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 2:21 am
In legalese, Corporate and Commercial Practice in Delaware confirms that this is the law in Delaware: [I]f specific performance of a contract would cause significant public harm, then the Court has discretion to deny such relief, even where a breach of contract and substantial harm to plaintiff have been established . . . 1-12 Corp & Commercial Practice in DE Court of Chancery § 12.03 (Matthew Bender 2008), citing Alro Assoc., L.P. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 7:58 am by Giles Peaker
The was developed further in Post Office v Aquarius Properties Ltd (1986) 54 P & CR 61, that: “where defects in the building had existed since the date when it was constructed, but there had been no damage to or deterioration in the condition of the building, a repairing covenant did not require the defect to be eradicated. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 8:57 am by paperstreet
The court followed its earlier decision in LVRC Holdings LLC v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 9:27 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
[Recall some of the background discussion in Lotus Development Corporation v. [read post]