Search for: "People v. Parks" Results 821 - 840 of 3,858
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2018, 6:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Supreme Court holds that a Minnesota law that prohibits people from wearing political clothing in a polling place violates the First Amendment.The case is Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 2:00 am by Adrian Miedema
The case arises from the collapse of the roof-top parking deck at the Algo Centre Mall in Elliot Lake, Ontario, in which two people were killed and many more injured. [read post]
19 May 2014, 4:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In 2006, for instance, Justice Anthony Kennedy stated as simple fact in eBay v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 4:13 pm by Michael W. Huseman
   Lee v Tam Amicus Brief by Mike Huseman on Scribd [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 5:22 pm
 There is something about putting on a black robe that makes people need an audience. [read post]
Reason and justice prevailed this week in Massachusetts, where the Commonwealth’s highest court ruled by a 5-1 margin in Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jul 2005, 8:52 am
But now the issue has arisen in a particularly stark form, the one that Roger predicted, in People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:55 pm by Kristina Araya
  First, the Court ordered that the application for leave to appeal in People v Prochowski, No. 143040, to be held in abeyance pending the decisions in People v Likine, People v Parks, and People vHarris. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 10:57 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  Several other people were injured when parts of the crane crushed an entire block of parked cars along the construction site. [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 4:22 am
The evidence presented at the suppression hearing establishes that defendant was in custody in the police vehicle when the arresting officer asked him questions about his life and his church (see People v Paulman, 5 NY3d 122, 129; People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589, cert denied 400 US 851),and the People failed to establish that the arresting officer's questions did not constitute interrogation or its functional equivalent (see Rhode Island v… [read post]